misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon with the prosecution against the petitioner and his over mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined from the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it suitable to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced towards the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques employed by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological features allows for your more in depth legal response.
Permit’s deal with what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders holding in view that among the respondents has retired from service as pointed out via the counsel for your respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order regarding costs. Read more
13. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is proven plus the employee is found guilty after because of process of regulation, it is the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the different penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct will not be sufficient though the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful fashion. Read more
VI) The petitioner is driving the bars because arrest, read more investigation of your case is complete, he isn't any more demanded to the purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him behind the bars before summary of trial will provide no helpful purpose.
The scrupulous reader might have noticed something over: a flaw. Beyond the first 7 words, the definition focuses around the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two basic elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
She did note that the boy still needed comprehensive therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Protected with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved from the actions.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions within the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it is important that the case recognized the application from the precautionary principle where there is usually a menace to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations in the State in protecting the right into a clean and healthy environment.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded on the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )